Inconsistencies and Contradictions

The farm laws have been repealed. Government's decision to repeal hints that accusations of agitators about farm laws are intended to end the MSP regime and hurt the big farmers might have been true. And there is no surprise. The farm laws were about easing the fiscal burden government faced due to procurement based on MSP. If government is not planning to ditch this route, then why it was not ready to make a law for using it? - The repeal seems to vindicate the doubt. Government failed to communicate the potential trajectory of changes the laws could have generated. One reason why government would have chosen not to reveal it is because it might have revealed some unpleasant possibilities, like some big businesses benefiting or section of farmers losing out and large section of farmers having no gain – no loss from it. But there is another reason why government chose to not communicate. It did not because it is extremely paternalistic towards Indians. The approach of Modi govern

 I read today about arrest of Maoist/Naxalite (I will use the terms interchangeably) Prashant Bose. Few days back, Milind Teltumbade died in encounter with police in Gadchiroli.  I admire Naxalites. It takes courage to take up on mighty state, especially when your life on such path is not going to be a cozy one. Whether we agree with path of Naxalites or not, whether we subscribe to ideology on left or right, we must ask - why would one participate in the armed struggle against the national state as mighty as India? The lifelong participation in armed struggle cannot be without a driving force. Influence in youth can drive one towards such path, but then disillusion can set in quickly.  It is easy to criticize or even condemn 'violence'. The kind of life I am living and I am likely to live, I am unlikely to experience a systematic violence due to religion, class, or caste/tribe. I am also unlikely to get exploited or uprooted due to these factors. But is the life of a tribal in

 I was listening to this podcast  about 'Model Tenancy Act'. The guests are an academic and a bureaucrat with career in housing policy. The premise is there is something wrong with rental market in India and Model tenancy act is there to fix it, at least part of it. Few thoughts crossed my mind while listening to this podcast. I am just listing them down.  Mumbai had a fairly successful model of rental housing during pre-independence period. Multi-story building, called 'chawl' with several small or medium sized tenements which shared toilet (and water-tap till individual taps were provided) facilities where each tenement was a rental unit. Though there is no evidence proving the causal link, the accepted wisdom is, rent control act, brought during the WWII and later continued in post-independence period killed this rental market.  It is this mass rental housing model with assured tenancy till one keeps on paying the rent and upward rental revisions are well-spaced out

 4th round of seroprevalence survey by ICMR in June-July 2021 has revealed that nearly 2/3rd of Indian population has antibodies. The presence of antibodies is assumed to indicate prior exposure (though not necessarily manifested with disease symptoms) to Coronavirus. Exposure to virus can be seen as indicative of low probability of Covid-19, at least for the short-term. Very high seropositivity, more than 70%, suggests low probability of occurrence of severe Covid-19 outbreak.  Table 1 After feeling somewhat relived over national estimate, if we look at state-level results, there is a variation of seropositivity levels. (Table 1) Seropositivity is highest in Madhya Pradesh (79%) and least in Kerala (44.4%). It has been noted with hint of surprise that Kerala and Maharashtra do not have very high seropositivity despite bagging the attention for their high Covid-19 numbers for sustained duration.  We must understand that one should read these state level numbers with some caution. Not a

 Stan Swamy, 84 years old and an accused in Bhima-Koregaon Violence and alleged and accused Maoist sympathizer died yesterday. He died while being detained without facing trial and with multiple rejections of a bail.  Prime facie, the manner of death is tragic, irrespective of whether accusations are proven or not. I do not presume Swamy's innocence, but I do not think he should be declared 'guilty' since courts have not declared him so.  His pictures on internet, where we see frail old man participating in various meetings and agitations, invoke a certain admiration. It is admirable to fight with the mighty state. But fact that he was in fight with state and admiration invoked by visual clues does not make him innocent. He might have been kind and loving to those around him, but that does not mean he was against violence of any sort. Being political activists is being selective about certain sort of violence. There is no one who is 'human right activist'. I know th

 On 7 th June 2021, PM has announced that 21 st June onwards there will not be state government supplied vaccination for age group 18-45 and all publicly provided vaccination will be through union government. For the end user of government vaccination, it remains to be a free vaccine as it was earlier, but it is likely that availability will improve. So, henceforth state governments will not have to deal with vaccine makers. When there are multiple users and limited resource, allocation decision is a key decision. When state governments were dealing with vaccine makers, vaccine makers had the right/power to choose the allocation. Now, union government will have that right. Since we see vaccination as a key national activity, it is indeed a correct change that democratically elected entity oversees allocation question. So now vaccination policy in India stands in the optimal form after a required course-correction. There is a nationwide free supply of vaccine only by union governm

 The news of private hospital ‘cornering’ 50% of the supply that has been sold in private market will lead to its share of outrage. The news heading is likely to be typically misleading, of 9 private hospitals cornering 50% of the doses, giving impression that out of total supply of vaccines 50% went to these 9 entities. The 50% is of total supply made to private hospitals. I do not find any surprise here. Vaccine makers will prefer large orders over bunch of small orders. It is likely that there will be distributing intermediaries between vaccine manufacturers and entities which conduct the vaccination to provide required large orders. Presence of intermediaries reduce profit of manufacturer as well as end of chain vaccinator. Large private hospital chains can bypass the intermediaries or provide the required large scale if there are no intermediaries. I am in fact surprised that nearly 50% of private market vaccine supply has gone to other than large players. It shows that even lar