Skip to main content

Year End Dream of Credit Fueled growth

             The key takeaway from PM's speech on 31st December 2016 was except the scheme declared for pregnant mothers, all other schemes are interest rate subsidies. 
             The housing scheme was kind of anticipated. PM has talked first about his vision of 'Housing for all by 2022' in his Madison square address. Then he reiterated the objective last month in one of his speeches. In today's speech, first definite measures have been announced towards achieving this objective. I think it's laudable, though I am slightly skeptical about wrong set of beneficiaries using the scheme and possible domino effects of using credit as main channel of boosting the growth. 
             One wonders how exactly government is going balance the trick of maintaining government deficit vis-a-vis bearing burden of all subsidies. I think the gap between value of old invalid notes and value of old invalid notes returned to banks will be used here. My guess is the gap will be declared at around 3 trillion rupees and a trust or regulatory body will be formed with this capital to oversee the housing credit objectives.
              Or banks will be given shot in the arm using this windfall gain, as many analyst have expected and some have warned against. The invigorated banks and cheaper credit supply along with better tax base will kick-start the economy, pivoting on real estate and hence allowing government to take on the subsidy burden. It seems bit like supply side economics, and just to spot the similarity, Trump's plan also have some supply side elements. 
              The thrust of less-cash economy hasn't been taken out. Earlier in the day, it has been declared that ATM withdrawals limits have been increased while bank withdrawal limits stay as it is. Various measure to coax producers in using digital mechanism have been provided. 
               One effect of this less-cash situation, will be cheaper funds for banks. Banks are flush with liquidity and structure has been put in place to make it difficult for consumers to suck out this bank deposit liquidity with hard-cash. Banks can lend more freely. And consumers are being told, 'Go, get your own house!'. 
          Pivoting on residential real estate can work wonder for next election, though it can hardly address core issues in Economics. PM is trying to touch the nerve of millions of Indian by trying to nudge them to be housing buyer. Just to put it in perspective, 9 lakh home loan with 5% effective rate for 20 years will come to around 6000 rupees monthly EMI! 
        Semi-urban and small city consumers can really benefit from the scheme and it will provide boost to affordable housing. The key assumption might be that such effect will have considerable spillovers and fuel other parts of the economy too. 
      We will read more nuanced analysis in few days. 
        I see many of my neighbours and friends, rushing to bank to buy their first, second or n-th home and at the same time wondering over why there are only 24 lakh tax payers with income above 10 lakh. 
       Really interesting times are ahead of us! 
                

Popular posts from this blog

Balia suffers and Mumbai stares

  More than 100 have died in Balia and Deoria district of Uttar Pradesh in last few days . These districts have experienced heatwave conditions. IMD has given orange alert warning (40℃ to 45℃) for these as well as other districts in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. For those who are aware, Kim Stanley Robinson’s Climate fiction ‘The Ministry for the Future’ opens with a stunning description of heatwave related deaths in Uttar Pradesh. What is happening now in Deoria and Balia district has uncanny resemblance to what author has imagined. In some sense, we have been made aware of what awaits us, though we have decided to bury it because it is inconvenient. Even now, these deaths are not officially attributed to heatwave. Here is what I think have happened. It is a hypothesis rather than a statement with some proof. Balia and Deoria are districts near Ganga, a large water body. Rising temperatures have caused greater evaporation of this water body leading to excessive humidity in the surround

4 years of Demonetization: How non-cash payments have fared?

  Kiran Limaye, Himank Kavathekar -----------             On 8 November 2020, it will be four years to an announcement of policy of withdrawal and reissuance of high denomination currency notes, or what we popularly call ‘demonetization’. One of the stated objectives of the policy was encouraging the use of non-cash payment modes. It is generally considered that non-cash payment modes, debit and credit cards, mobile based payment mechanisms like UPI and prepaid payment instruments like mobile wallets are better than cash, for individual as well as for a society. These non-cash alternatives have less risk of theft and both ends of transactions are traced unlike cash which can be used without trace. But these non-cash modes require higher consumer involvement (for example, knowing pins and maintaining their secrecy and ability to operate smartphone beyond routine call receipt and dial) which are not acquired by section of population, mainly due to factors such as age or education. It w

Clash of Egos: Prashant Bhushan versus Supreme court in contempt of court

 Contempt is a notion defined with pre-existence of sense of self. If I do not possess ego, a sense of self, then I will not get offended by any contempt thrown at me. Yet, contempt plays a role in society in terms of a signal. We learn by experiences, but we chose through signals. I decide to buy based on reviews, which are signals. I decide to choose a path of education based on signals. Contempt can change the nature of signals about a person, an organization and an institution and change in signals can bring change in response of clients. This is the logic of reaction of supreme court, that if nature of perception of Supreme court changes due to contemptuous statements about supreme court then it will lead to  harm of the nation as Indians will use the institution of Supreme court in sub-optimal manner. It is a kind of utilitarian or consequential logic. The objection of Prashant Bhushan (PB) remark is not out of the nature of remarks per say, but due to the consequences.  I do not