Skip to main content

Naxalites in Bhima-Koregaon aftermath?

             Analysts sympathetic to RSS have expressed their suspicion about involvement of Maoist extremists in the Bhima-Koregaon agitation. This suspicion was based on strategic use of violence that was evident in the whole period from Elgar Parishad in Pune to 3rd January 2018's Maharashtra Bandh. Dalits in Maharashtra, even when intellectually more awoken than Dalits elsewhere were not known to exhibit their political nuisance value in such organized manner. So the observed sense of timing, sudden agitations on 2nd January and agitators appearing at unexpected locations like Thane or western suburbs contrary to the expectation of Eastern Mumbai an epicentre, have made analyst hypothesize the presence of naxalites. 
              The suspicion has turned more solid as ATS has caught some alleged maoists involved in Bhima-Koregaon violence. (News here) Regional newspapers have not revealed the name of anyone, but ToI news has the name of leader. 
          Naxalites is the worst form of violence, equal to Islamic terrorism, as the end goal of this violence is some utopian undemocratic form of polity. I have some sympathy towards naxalites since the ultimate cause of naxalite violence, exploitation of tribals is a real tragedy in democratic India. And in India, it is violence that can uplift the political status of any group, not any other expression. But the violence needs to serve the democratic goals, winning the election to increase the patronage of party's support base and it cannot be against the police. That's where Naxalites have misled the whole question of tribals. But there is some room to think that it was the only resort left to them. But now as they have brought the question of tribals in the light, they have to dissolve in more democratic institution, something which they do not seem to wish. The continuation of naxalite violence will generate increasing collateral damage and delay the integration of tribal in mainstream India. In my opinion, Indian state needs to apologize to tribals for decades of neglect and then naxalites should be given 10 year imprisonment where they can be politically active, but spatially constrained. It will need imagination and some elementary trust from both sides, but that seems difficult to happen.
        Coming back to alleged participation of naxalites in Bhima-Koregaon agitation, I think as much as realistic possibility of such participation, there is also realistic possibility that 'participation of naxalites' is the ruse used by BJP. Once naxalites are proved to be the mastermind of Bhima-Koregaon, the dalit anger narrative doesn't remain the cause of agitation. The story becomes 'naive dalit activists being misled by unpatriotic naxalites' and then BJP is a grieving party. 
       I think that naxalites have some participation in the agitation. What is actually more worrying is use of BJP's playbook in developing Bhima-Koregaon agitation. Sentimental historical inconclusive issue and democratically delimited violence are the tools BJP have successfully applied in their rise. So far, opposition to BJP was ideological and hence difficult to get popular momentum. Now, the BJP opposition is bringing together the wider unrest in non-metropolitan youth due to widening gap between aspiration and realization and politics of inflammable sentiments. That is the potent mixture and BJP needs to douse it on urgent basis. 
          Hence it is important that inquiry of captured naxalites is well-communicated to the public and shouldn't happen in opaque manner. Shifting the narrative of dalit anger to dalit being used by naxalites will serve the short term interest, but that is not going to help in bigger question. I hope long run sensibility will prevail over short-run gains.     

Popular posts from this blog

Balia suffers and Mumbai stares

  More than 100 have died in Balia and Deoria district of Uttar Pradesh in last few days . These districts have experienced heatwave conditions. IMD has given orange alert warning (40℃ to 45℃) for these as well as other districts in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. For those who are aware, Kim Stanley Robinson’s Climate fiction ‘The Ministry for the Future’ opens with a stunning description of heatwave related deaths in Uttar Pradesh. What is happening now in Deoria and Balia district has uncanny resemblance to what author has imagined. In some sense, we have been made aware of what awaits us, though we have decided to bury it because it is inconvenient. Even now, these deaths are not officially attributed to heatwave. Here is what I think have happened. It is a hypothesis rather than a statement with some proof. Balia and Deoria are districts near Ganga, a large water body. Rising temperatures have caused greater evaporation of this water body leading to excessive humidity in the surround

4 years of Demonetization: How non-cash payments have fared?

  Kiran Limaye, Himank Kavathekar -----------             On 8 November 2020, it will be four years to an announcement of policy of withdrawal and reissuance of high denomination currency notes, or what we popularly call ‘demonetization’. One of the stated objectives of the policy was encouraging the use of non-cash payment modes. It is generally considered that non-cash payment modes, debit and credit cards, mobile based payment mechanisms like UPI and prepaid payment instruments like mobile wallets are better than cash, for individual as well as for a society. These non-cash alternatives have less risk of theft and both ends of transactions are traced unlike cash which can be used without trace. But these non-cash modes require higher consumer involvement (for example, knowing pins and maintaining their secrecy and ability to operate smartphone beyond routine call receipt and dial) which are not acquired by section of population, mainly due to factors such as age or education. It w

Clash of Egos: Prashant Bhushan versus Supreme court in contempt of court

 Contempt is a notion defined with pre-existence of sense of self. If I do not possess ego, a sense of self, then I will not get offended by any contempt thrown at me. Yet, contempt plays a role in society in terms of a signal. We learn by experiences, but we chose through signals. I decide to buy based on reviews, which are signals. I decide to choose a path of education based on signals. Contempt can change the nature of signals about a person, an organization and an institution and change in signals can bring change in response of clients. This is the logic of reaction of supreme court, that if nature of perception of Supreme court changes due to contemptuous statements about supreme court then it will lead to  harm of the nation as Indians will use the institution of Supreme court in sub-optimal manner. It is a kind of utilitarian or consequential logic. The objection of Prashant Bhushan (PB) remark is not out of the nature of remarks per say, but due to the consequences.  I do not