Skip to main content

A week of demonetization

Now, it has been week when we woke up to a realization that ₹ 500 and $ 1000 notes that many of us had are no more a legal tender. After the frenzied 1st day, when everyone kept strategizing about their response, 2nd day onwards, we are witnessing long queues in bank branches and ATMs. There are reports of 25 deaths in the country during the week which are reported to be due to demonetization decision. Market has been in the red, though on the first day, after collapsing for about more than 1500 points, it recovered back strongly. But then 14th and 15th November, market has collapsed further. (As I am writing this on 16th November morning around 9 AM, market is up by about 150 points.)
Newspapers have been reporting about long queues and slow sales. Somehow, there is no way that one can credibly verify what is happening in different parts of the country. Social media is abuzz with mainly support and little critique. That’s the grip of current government on minds. I think politically there have been gains so far, and unless economic stress goes beyond control, political gains will not evaporate. The economic stress will increasingly relaxing as cash becomes increasingly available. The decision to increase withdrawal limits hint at feedback being positive.
Yet, we can agree that apart from few hearsay accounts of how individuals with unaccountable currency are terrified, what we have witnessed and we will agree about, is anxiety and time lost in standing in queues. (Some of us might mock whether this a great loss at all and hail all the potential benefits, yet to be realized!) I have not stood in the ATM or bank queue so far, but I realize that moment is near around the weekend corner unless I meet some surplus currency (new and white!) angels. J I have observed that shelves in jewelry shops are empty or some jewelry shops are closed. But snacks corners and shops are functioning, so as hotels, with some cash problems. I haven’t witnessed any panic or expression of loss, but I have witnessed heated arguments in the queue for exchange about whose queue is the right queue or whether there is some usurper.
I haven’t read reports of violence or mob gone out of control at bank branches. It is being a week and I think if nothing of that sort has happened in first week, it will not happen in the remaining days. The anxiety will be waning now. I do not know how those who planned the move have thought about the reaction of crores of Indians and possibility of violence. But they must have thought something. The post-Diwali timing reveals damage-minimizing (to common buyers who make purchases of durables or jewelry during the period) and probability maximizing (of catching individuals flush with unaccountable cash) approach. Lack of violence or mob frenzy can be indicator of good judgement of public’s action by those who designed the move or may be troubles have not yet come to boil (which I think is less likely). And, this lack of violent incidences or expressions can also be an indicator that great number of Indians are finding the move agreeable. This agreement is not due to complete understanding of cost and benefit of move (benefits are in fact yet to be seen), but mostly because envy and anger at the riches of others, a phenomenon which is ubiquitous. UP and other elections will tell us if this reasoning is right or wrong.
--
I keep thinking what sort of information I would like to examine about this experiment of demonetization.
1.       I would like to see city level/ branch level daily data of currency deposits and exchanges for the demonetization period
2.       I would like to know distribution of accounts for number of transactions witnessed during the period and balance in the accounts (same information for PAN numbers if transactions are simply exchanges)
3.       The gap between stock of old currency and total of invalid currency which has been exchanged by 30th December 2016 and eventually 31st March 2017
I keep wondering about few implications (seen as benefits) of the demonetization. I haven’t figured them completely yet.
1.       Effect on interest rate due to increase in bank deposits (may not happen in this case, but as a theoretical question)
2.       Shift to cash-less mode of transactions
3.       Bounty for RBI or government assuming some stock of old currency never find its way back to RBI
The way I make sense of the current move is as follows:
1.       ‘Sudden’ move aimed at catching hoarders of currency unaware
2.       These hoarders include terror and naxalism funders, drug dealers, individuals involved in human trafficking and flesh trade etc.
3.       Wealth tax on hoarders of unaccountable cash (either they just destruct their value or lose part of it in the exchange)
4.       Some offenders will be punished after 30th December 2016 with due process of inquiry (I think government will act and there will be terror funders who will be caught. I am increasingly assuming that this government will act, act with surprise and shrewd judgement and based on continuous feedback it gathers through its eyes and ears on social media and society, will keep on tweaking and communicating through media and social media.) Culling of some culprits will be essential to successfully garner the political mileage.
--
I would like to see end/reduction of black economy since that can improve tax collection and can force check on terror, human trafficking and drugs. Yet, as much I welcome the current move (provided some follow-up actions as promised), I would like to state that demonetization can provide only a good start. We must understand that many of us were partner in the crime when we thought of saving on taxes by paying through cash. We might reason that home or an appliance I bought was much more valuable than realization of I am doing something wrong, and hence I did it. But, then will we accept the same argument from others, those with much more wealth? Is responsibility of doing ‘right’ is increasing function of income and wealth? I think, if we are going to accept such defense, then our opposition to black money is simply envy and not a justified position.
--

I keep observing this experiment with earnest interest. If nothing else, I will end up having better understanding of many of the monetary economics concepts. That is no less gain!     

Popular posts from this blog

Balia suffers and Mumbai stares

  More than 100 have died in Balia and Deoria district of Uttar Pradesh in last few days . These districts have experienced heatwave conditions. IMD has given orange alert warning (40℃ to 45℃) for these as well as other districts in Eastern Uttar Pradesh. For those who are aware, Kim Stanley Robinson’s Climate fiction ‘The Ministry for the Future’ opens with a stunning description of heatwave related deaths in Uttar Pradesh. What is happening now in Deoria and Balia district has uncanny resemblance to what author has imagined. In some sense, we have been made aware of what awaits us, though we have decided to bury it because it is inconvenient. Even now, these deaths are not officially attributed to heatwave. Here is what I think have happened. It is a hypothesis rather than a statement with some proof. Balia and Deoria are districts near Ganga, a large water body. Rising temperatures have caused greater evaporation of this water body leading to excessive humidity in the surround

4 years of Demonetization: How non-cash payments have fared?

  Kiran Limaye, Himank Kavathekar -----------             On 8 November 2020, it will be four years to an announcement of policy of withdrawal and reissuance of high denomination currency notes, or what we popularly call ‘demonetization’. One of the stated objectives of the policy was encouraging the use of non-cash payment modes. It is generally considered that non-cash payment modes, debit and credit cards, mobile based payment mechanisms like UPI and prepaid payment instruments like mobile wallets are better than cash, for individual as well as for a society. These non-cash alternatives have less risk of theft and both ends of transactions are traced unlike cash which can be used without trace. But these non-cash modes require higher consumer involvement (for example, knowing pins and maintaining their secrecy and ability to operate smartphone beyond routine call receipt and dial) which are not acquired by section of population, mainly due to factors such as age or education. It w

Clash of Egos: Prashant Bhushan versus Supreme court in contempt of court

 Contempt is a notion defined with pre-existence of sense of self. If I do not possess ego, a sense of self, then I will not get offended by any contempt thrown at me. Yet, contempt plays a role in society in terms of a signal. We learn by experiences, but we chose through signals. I decide to buy based on reviews, which are signals. I decide to choose a path of education based on signals. Contempt can change the nature of signals about a person, an organization and an institution and change in signals can bring change in response of clients. This is the logic of reaction of supreme court, that if nature of perception of Supreme court changes due to contemptuous statements about supreme court then it will lead to  harm of the nation as Indians will use the institution of Supreme court in sub-optimal manner. It is a kind of utilitarian or consequential logic. The objection of Prashant Bhushan (PB) remark is not out of the nature of remarks per say, but due to the consequences.  I do not